Fitch Affirms Kazakhmys Insurance at IFS ‘B+’; Outlook Stable

Fitch affirms CAEPCo at 'B+'; Outlook Stable

Fitch Ratings-London-11 July 2017: Fitch Ratings has affirmed JSC Kazakhmys Insurance Company’s (Kazakhmys Ins) Insurer Financial Strength (IFS) Rating at ‘B+’ and its National IFS rating at ‘BBB(kaz)’. The Outlooks are Stable.

KEY RATING DRIVERS
Kazakhmys Ins’s capital position is strong for the rating level and the insurer has a track record of profitability. Offsetting factors include the low average credit quality of its investment portfolio, aggressive growth strategy and high dependence on outwards reinsurance.

Based on Fitch’s Prism factor-based model (Prism FBM), Kazakhmys Ins’s capital score improved to “extremely strong” at end-2016, from “strong” at end-2015. The company maintained low net premium volumes, which together with considerable reinsurance utilisation, led to stable target capital. In addition capital injections from shareholders increased the available capital and contributed to the strengthened capitalisation.

The capital injections have also created an extensive buffer in the insurer’s regulatory solvency margin, which grew to 411% at end- 2016. However, due to subsequent considerable top-line gross premium growth and changes in the solvency reporting calculation basis the regulatory solvency margin decreased to, albeit a still comfortable level of, 133% at end-5M17.

Kazakhmys Ins has a track record of positive financial results over the last five years. In 2016 the company reported moderate net income of KZT355 million compared with the 2015 result of KZT994 million. Unlike 2015, the net result in 2016 was mainly supported by a strong gross investment component of KZT907 million and by rather modest underwriting income. Adversely, a considerable impairment loss of KZT417 million and an FX loss on investments of KZT240 million negatively impacted earnings, and led to a net investment result of KZT240 million. In 5M17 the company reported a modest net income of KZT23 million based on regulatory statutory reporting, supported by investment returns as was the case for 2016 results.

In 2016 Kazakhmys Ins’s underwriting result turned positive at KZT153 million compared with an underwriting loss of KZT308 million in 2015, with the combined ratio improving to 96% from 115%. The loss ratio decreased to 35% in 2016 from 40% in 2015, with compulsory motor-third party liability insurance being the main contributor.

Fitch views Kazakhmys Ins’s investment portfolio to be of weak credit quality. Bank deposits accounted for 67% of Kazakhmys Ins’s total investments at end-2016 compared with 79% at end-2015, before falling further to 50% at end-5M17. All deposits are held in local banks mainly rated in ‘B’ category. Fitch notes the weak average credit quality of these banks, which is mainly attributable to the poor financial standing of the local banking system.

The company reported significant growth in 2016, with gross written premiums increasing by 160% from 2015 levels. Growth on a net premium basis was lower at 83% in 2016. Net growth was largely driven by compulsory motor third-party liability (MTPL) policies and, to a lesser extent, by the general third-party liability (TPL) business. As a result, the share of MTPL in the company’s underwriting portfolio grew to 62% in 2016 from 52% in 2015.

Kazakhmys Ins’s reinsurance utilisation ratio was very high and increased to 89% in 2016 from 84% in 2015 with a five-year average of 81%. The company uses reinsurance primarily for fronting purposes on property, third-party liability, and health risks for big commercial accounts, including Kazakhmys Corporation.

RATING SENSITIVITIES
The ratings could be upgraded if Kazakhmys Ins improves the average asset credit quality of investments and successfully implements its growth strategy, with sustainable underwriting profitability and diversification of the portfolio.

The ratings could be downgraded if the regulatory solvency margin falls below 110% on a sustained basis or if shareholders fail to support Kazakhmys Ins’s growth strategy.

Contact:

Primary Analyst
Anastasia Surudina
Analyst
+7 495 956 5570
Fitch Ratings CIS Limited
Valovaya Street, 26
Moscow 115054

Secondary Analyst
Sam Mageed
Director
+44 20 3530 1704

Committee Chairperson
Chris Waterman
Managing Director
+44 20 3530 1168

Media Relations: Athos Larkou, London, Tel: +44 203 530 1549, Email: athos.larkou@fitchratings.com.

Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com

Applicable Criteria
Insurance Rating Methodology (pub. 26 Apr 2017)

Additional Disclosures
Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form
Solicitation Status
Endorsement Policy

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK:HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY’S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH’S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE AT HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/SITE/REGULATORY. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.
Copyright © 2017 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

Share